Fact Find UX Tracker
We’ll use this space to list and summarise actions based on In-depth Interviews, Research and Design Reviews.
Task | Status | Priority | Assigned | Description | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Progess bar | Closed |
|
| Agree metics for defining '% completion' | 💬 |
Progess bar | CLOSED |
| @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Show workflow for when 'ready for sourcing' | 💬 |
Progress bar | Closed | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Hide from UI designs | 💬 |
Tool tips | CLOSED |
| @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Add/illustrate how tool tips work |
|
Add applicants - summary | CLOSED |
|
| Show workflow and wfs on how a user would add an applicant from the fact find summary |
|
Add applicants - fact find | CLOSED |
|
| Show workflow and wfs on how a user would add an applicant from the fact find applicants page. How does this impact other fact find pages which rely on the number of applicants |
|
Define standing data for revised workflow | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| Understand requirements for the new UJ Asking general questions → Product → Fact Find → Amend Product if needed. | 💬 |
Left-aligned labels | CLOSED |
|
| Confirm this is the approved UI | 💬 |
Fact Find catagories | BLOCKED | 2 - med
|
| Consider splitting Fact Find Pages into sections on the main nav. ie Core questions, residential mortgae questions, equity release questions | 💬 |
Section notes | CLOSED |
|
| Consider as part of the standing data a section for taking notes in each section |
|
Ability to copy data across | CLOSED |
|
| consider where this adds value | 💬 |
Standing data | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| Need to agree standing data set (templates) that come out of the box that follow this workflow: | 💬 |
Criteria search | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| Can we integrate with Knowledge bank for criteria search? | 💬 |
Affordability checks | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| can we integrate Brokersense (or other) for affordability checks? | 💬 |
Move 'Add Fact Find' | BLOCKED | 3 - low | @Matt Oxley | Currently the fact find sits in the product tab – should, as a quick fix, move this to the case summary tab? | 💬 |
Customer portal | BLOCKED | 2 - med |
| This should be consistent with the new FF. Is this in scope ? | 💬 |
Multiple document upload | Re-opened | 2 - med | @Matt Oxley @Alan Kington | is there a requirement to upload documents in the broker Fact find? | 💬 |
Drag and drop | Re-opened | 2 - med | @Matt Oxley @Alan Kington | is there a requirement to upload documents in the broker Fact find? | 💬 |
User support | CLOSED |
|
| To help adoption of new UI and reduce support calls – should we include links in the new UI to help guides/byte size videos ? |
|
Customer Vulnerability | CLOSED |
|
| Add vulnerability - yes/no. if yes, add comment box to allow broker to fill in details |
|
Customer Vulnerability | CLOSED |
|
| Can we have an agreed set of criteria that should a customer meet that it autoflags in the system that they are vulnerable. This criteria can be customised by the broker firm |
|
Customer Vulnerability | CLOSED |
|
| Flags could include visual indicators on customer profile. Warning pop banners when a user opens a case/factfind etc |
|
Customer Vulnerability | BLOCKED | 3 - low | @Alan Kington | This needs a lot of consideration. Guidelines are 'fluffy' 4 key areas. Health, financial etc. need to consider what comes out of the box | 💬 |
Customer Vulnerability | CLOSED |
|
| Add hover over interaction to the warning symbiol - informing detail of vulnerability |
|
Customer Duty | BLOCKED | 3 - low | @Alan Kington | Need to arrange education on Customer Duty and what it is. | 💬 |
CRM Brand customisation | CLOSED | 3 - low | @Alan Kington | Need to agree if this is a requirement or not | 💬 |
Custom Fields | BLOCKED | 2 - med | @Alan Kington | Requirement to add multiple panels with custom fields - Alan to confirm |
|
Testing | BLOCKED | 2 - med | @Matt Oxley @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Need to arrange customer testing of prototype | 💬 |
Testing | BLOCKED | 2 - med | @Alan Kington | Agree metrics for success | 💬 |
Testing | BLOCKED | 2 - med | @Alan Kington | Agree analytic tools for CRM |
|
Applicant name | CLOSED |
|
| Applicant name |
|
Budget Planner | CLOSED |
|
| include ONS Data integration | 💬 |
Property purchase | CLOSED |
|
| add hometrack integration to property purchase UI | 💬 |
Submit Fact Find | CLOSED |
|
| We need to reconsider CTAs labeling | 💬 |
Submit Fact Find | CLOSED |
|
| Clear visual statement if the Fact find has been completed and by who (poss. Across header?) |
|
AML and PEP checks | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| This is to be considered in the case UI workflow | 💬 |
Adding additional data | CLOSED |
|
| need to show how the UI will work when broker adds dependencies or adds additional liabilities | 💬 |
Add promotional banner | CLOSED |
|
| Add promotion banner to the log in page |
|
Super user menu | Closed |
| @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Add super user menu to the fact find summary page - includes 'change fact find' and 'view editable questions' toggle |
|
Labelling of subsets | CLOSED |
|
| Main challenge is brokers dont use subsets. Is it an education? will better labelling help? | 💬 |
Agree standard data set out of the box | BLOCKED | 3 - low | @Matt Oxley | Single set of qs that dynamically update fact find based on products selected. Inc all subsets |
|
Dependants | CLOSED |
|
| Dont use full DOB component. Brokers use year of birth for minors to comply with GDPR |
|
Hometrack | BLOCKED | 3 - low |
| Broker suggested adding this to customer portal as well. | 💬 |
Autosave | Opened | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Scenario - what if broker accidentally deletes some data (eg name, DOB). How do they recover it. | 💬 |
System messages | CLOSED |
| @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Add 'dont show me this again' feature to system messages on login screen |
|
System messages | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Add warning message panel to summary/fact find pages currently the warning panels dont stand out enough | 💬 |
New applicant | CLOSED |
|
| Need to agree on how do we add applicants from FF Summary, during filling FF, and how do we view/edit applicant details | 💬 |
Products | CLOSED |
|
| Add ability to remove products |
|
Fact Find name | CLOSED |
|
| Add ability to change FF name |
|
Sources of income | CLOSED |
|
| Table with sources of income, and adding a source of income flow |
|
Budget Planner | CLOSED |
|
| Add a postcode input field, so that a user can import the data from a specific area |
|
Fact Find Structure | BLOCKED | 1 - high | @Alan Kington | Can applicant data be stored against the applicant profile. Needs discovery/testing Speak to Alan |
|
Lock Page feature | Closed | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Brokers still need ability to 'lock' or mark a page as 'completed'. This needs reflecting on the pages menu | 💬 |
Unlinking applicants | Closed |
|
| Whats the workflow when you unlink/remove applicant | 💬 |
Applicants treatment | Opened | 1 - high | @Alan Kington | What happens in the background when a broker adds an applicant during a FF Process? | 💬 |
System messages | Closed |
|
| Once we agree how linking/removing applicants work, we need to update system messages in warning modals | 💬 |
Forms | Opened | 3 - low | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Design all forms based on Auto Layout - as soon as we agree on label alignment |
|
Design file | CLOSED |
| @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Clean the Design file and separate static designs pages from a prototype flow |
|
Prototype | CLOSED |
| @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Prepare both FF Summary and Forms prototypes for the Interviews |
|
Fact Find Summary | CLOSED |
|
| Validate if brokers need to see "Show all possible questions" filter | 💬 |
Spelling | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Check spelling of 'available' |
|
Quick key commands | BLOCKED | 3 - low | @Alan Kington | Can brokers use browser quick key commands such as ALT FIND to locate content ? Needs to be discussed with Alan to see if this doable |
|
Accessibility | Opened | 2 - med | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | After wrapping up this stage, go through all designs again and make sure everything is accessible & colour contrast | 💬 |
Request Broker Fact Finds | Opened | 1 - high | @Matt Oxley | Should we request copies of broker fact find so we can get an idea of the size/structure/questions? |
|
Budget Planner calculations | Opened | 2 - med | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Ability for brokers to add functionality to build simple calculation tools and provide sub totals for grouped data. Eg Add up all credit commitments and summerise the total commitment |
|
Timestamped Notes | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Some open fact finds could possibly be years old and contain misleading time sensitive comments. Customer asked if they could be timestamped. | 💬 |
Creating new applicants | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | When adding a new customer it should check the brokers customer database for matching so as to avoid creating duplicate records Change the workflow so that when adding/linking new applicant that the first step is to check if there is an existing applicant Include check point that when user ‘Adds applicant’ or ‘add more details’ to a new applicant the system checks and if there is a match then brings back model user wants to create new user or use existing with ability to see a summary view of existing applicant |
|
Budget Planner ONS feed | CLOSED | 3 - low | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | add ability to copy ONS data to the submission fields |
|
Budget Planner ONS feed | CLOSED | 3 - low | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Include regional option |
|
Multiple applicants | CLOSED | 1- high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Ability to change/choose main applicant | 💬 |
Multiple applicants | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Make better use of real estate to fit two applicants. Improve labelling when scrolling multiple applicants |
|
Multiple Applicants - source of income | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Need to show how multiple applicants works of source of income table |
|
Multiple Applicants - source of income | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Need to show how multiple applicants works of budget planner table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Save and close fact find rule | closed | 1 - high | @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Document rule that CTA returns iuser to where they opended the FF ie case view |
|
Change logic of Progress Bars | CLOSED | 3- low | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) | Progress bars within sections are now based on all questions, not only mandatory |
|
Documentation | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | specific features and rules within fact find described and handed over to dev team | Keep up to date |
Accessibility problems | CLOSED | 1 - high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) @Matt Gluszek (Unlicensed) | Accessibility problems have been solved with a Design System colors & components update |
|
Both prototypes updated with the new designs | CLOSED | 3- high | @Piotrek Rak (Unlicensed) |
|
|
Consider removing top nav when filling a fact find | Opened | 3 - low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|